I want to replace my X-T10 with X-T30 II and I have some questions in that regard. But you've piqued my curiosity so when I get some extra time (haha) I'm going to do a comparison with it. I've only been using it to store my iPhone photos. It's interesting you mention Apple Photos. But I also make use of the specialized and time saving tasks available in Topaz products, Luminar, etc. I use ON1 and Lightroom for raw processing along with some other adjustments. It's OK to use multiple products, especially in light of how inexpensive many tools are now. I think the important thing to remember is that there is no one processing solution to fit all situations. So for you and many Fuji users out there the best workflow is my Fuji Option 1. That is if you want to make use of all the useful filters in Luminar. The idea behind my article was to show that they are on the right track and compared to a few months ago there is a big improvement in Fuji files. I agree that Luminar would not make a good primary raw converter at this point without lens corrections. Let's be fair, even Mac Photo's does a better job on rawconverting So my advice would be to wait and use something else, or simply use the filters, if you like them. They have promised to work on it and it might be in their autumn update. Why? Because Fuji make some in camera changes and even these are not or not good recognised by Luminar. If you sell it as a rawconverter and you don't even have the possibility to change it by hand, than it's useless. For me that was and still is a big downer. I saw you mentioned in your article the lack of lensdistortion control.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |